LCV

Menu
LCV News

NEWS ABOUT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - January-February/2001

 IBGC – Brazilian Corporate Governance Institute

- Now into its sixth year of intense activity, the IBGC (Brazilian Corporate Governance Institute) is extending its activities in response to the growing influence of Corporate Governance in the domestic and global business scenario.  Among its chief objectives are the extension of its Best Practices Code and the creation of a Board of Directors database.  In its training and qualification area, the IBGC will offer seven (7) courses of four (4) different programs. These are the “Board of Directors Case Study”, the Second Brazilian Corporate Governance Congress in November, in addition to its twelve (12) monthly events.  All training/qualification program details are available on our site (www.ibgc.org.br).  

Brazilian Central Bank endorsement of New Market share investments.

- The Central Bank is honoring the promises of Brazil’s monetary authorities to encourage good corporate governance practices, and has made publicly available (www.bcb.gov.br), through March 2, 2001, the draft Resolution that will, in future, regulate Brazilian pension fund investments. Anyone can suggest changes that, if accepted, will result in small amendments, since the Government has already taken the basic decisions. The “new 2720”, as it is known in the market, is a reference to Resolution 2720 enacted by the National Monetary Council in April, and subsequently suspended for revision. The new resolution endorses several methods of attracting investments in New Market shares.  The first and most common of these is that only pension funds allocating a minimum percentage of their funds (computed based on a variety of parameters) to the Bovespa (São Paulo Stock Exchange) New Market, are permitted to attain the maximum legally permitted share investment percentage.  Another incentive for companies that apply good corporate governance practices relates to public share offers.  In other words, pension fund involvement in new primary market share offers is restricted to public share offers of companies whose corporate governance principles comply with Bovespa New Market standards. The draft resolution establishes that Brazil’s major investors, its pension funds, must comply with the new regulations through to the close of 2001. It is interesting to note that the Portuguese language expression used by the Brazilian Central Bank on this matter is Governança Societária rather than Governança Corporativa, the latter being the standard Brazilian terminology.

Bovespa (São Paulo Stock Exchange) to appoint an ombudsman.

- The Madrid Stock Exchange’s highly successful 1991 appointment of an ombudsman will be the model for a similar experiment that Bovespa intends to introduce during the first half of this year.  This endeavor, allied to the legal requirement for settling corporate disputes through arbitration, will ensure increased transparency and equity for all shareholders involved in this new share market sector.  This topic, in addition to several others such as the impact of the New Market, computerized trading, the Internet, and the integration of the Mercosul (Latin American Southern Cone Market) Stock Markets, will be covered in a talk to be given at 12.30 on March 9, at the Nacional Clube in São Paulo.  This lunch is sponsored by Adeval (Association of Securities Distributors).  Tickets and reservations at tel.: (11) 239 0155 or by e-mail at adeval@adeval.com.br.

Transparency, Ethics, and Equity

- The more important principles of good Corporate Governance include Transparency, Ethics, and Equity.  In Brazil, where only recently has it become an accepted practice to appoint minority shareholder representatives to boards of directors and shareholders appointed audit boards, we see a potential for conflict of interests relating to privileged information.  This predicament persists despite the unequivocal position established by Brazilian Corporation Legislation in its article 154, paragraph 1, which states: “A board member elected by a group or category of shareholders is bound by the same duties to the company as all other members.  Thus, in no circumstances, even in the defense of the interests of the shareholders who elected him/her, may such board member default in such duties.”  This rule also applies, in the case of publicly quoted corporations, to privileged information potentially in the interests of the directors or third parties, whereby the board members must honor the confidentiality of any information that has not yet been made public in the market.  This somewhat controversial topic was discussed by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Perdigão Group, Eggon João da Silva, in an editorial in the November/December 2000 house organ, Revista Perdigão Hoje, and can be found in the LCV Technical Material Section (www.lcvco.com.br).

Study Group - Family Firm Institute, Brazil

- In February, the Brazil Study Group, backed by the US-based Family Firm Institute (FFI), USA, the leading and most traditional institute dedicated exclusively to family businesses, sponsored yet another event for its members and people interested in family firm matters in Brazil and throughout the world.  The event was coordinated by FFI Group members, Antônio Carlos Vidigal and René Werner and covered two topics related to Corporate Governance in family businesses: Independent Auditors and efficient Boards of Directors that include outside members.  The first topic, “The Benefits of Auditing Services in Family Firms”, was presented by Arthur Andersen Senior Partner, Paulo Pinese, and the second topic “Family Firm Case Study” was discussed by  Roberto Faldini. This year, for the first time since its foundation, the FFI will hold its annual meeting outside US territory.  It will be held in London from October 10 through 13.  Further details available from (www.ffi.org).

The increasing globalization of Boards of Directors

- Ever sensitive to the fluctuations of the economy, Corporate Governance has become increasingly globalized.  Among the many indicators of this trend to internationalism is the interest of governments and international organizations in Corporate Governance, the number of countries that have established best practice codes, the success of the ICGN (International Corporate Governance Network) which will hold its seventh Annual Meeting in Tokyo, Japan from July 11 through 13 of this year and, lastly, the globalization of Boards of Directors.  One of the principal features of the Global Boards, to use the commonly accepted terminology for Globalized Boards of Directors, is the involvement of independent board members of differing nationalities, particularly from the countries where the respective companies operate.  This is the case of the Spanish organization, Telefónica, that recently appointed to its Board, Brazilian, Luiz Fernando Furlan, the Chairman of the Sadia Board of Directors and a member of the International Board of Coca-Cola, and Argentina’s Mario Vasquez, former senior partner of Arthur Andersen Argentina.

Solutions brought in from outside

- The CEO, the shareholders, the Board of Directors, the independent auditors, and in Brazil, the shareholder appointed audit board, are the pillars of corporate governance.  While the Board of Directors reinforces its strength in a company’s power structure, it is through the CEO that it influences the company’s business. Thus, the presence of an effective CEO capable of implementing defined strategies, one who competently carries out company operations, and who possesses leadership and motivational skills, is the central aim and object of any Board of Directors.  Executives such as these can swiftly upgrade the market’s value perception of their companies.

It is interesting to note that the Gillette Board of Directors recently appointed former Nabisco CEO, James Kilts, as its CEO.  This was the first time in seventy years that the world leader in shaving equipment manufacturers searched outside the company for the ideal candidate for this important position.  The market seems to have granted its seal of approval, as evidenced by the performance of the company’s shares that, since March 1999, had dropped to half their value, and upon the announcement of this new appointment, suddenly took an upward turn.  Another example of a proven solution brought in from outside is Japan’s automobile manufacturer, Nissan.  Under the leadership of Brazil’s Carlos Ghosn, indicated by Renault to be its own CEO, and ranking as one of the world’s 25 most successful executives, Nissan astonished the market by overcoming its hitherto grave problems, and reported its best results since 1990. These and similar examples unequivocally show that independent board members, in addition to the intrinsic advantages of such independence, can greatly contribute to corporate solutions, thanks to their vision and experience outside the company.

The vital role of the Audit Committee in Corporate Governance

- The Audit Committee, a technical committee answering to the Board of Directors, and which should not be confused with the Shareholders Appointed Audit Board required under Brazilian Corporation Law, is highly recommended and has become a standard feature in US companies.  Not only is it a vital extension of the Board of Directors in its important role of controlling company operations, but the Audit Committee, that normally consists only of board members with financial and control experience, is an effective communication channel between the Board of Directors and the company’s independent auditors.  Few companies in Brazil avail themselves of this important offshoot of the Board of Directors, and an essential tool for the shareholders in general and, most especially, for those at a distance from day-to-day company operations. The Bovespa New Market would have done well to define some operating criteria for this committee in its regulations.  Further to this topic, Arthur Andersen has published “Best Global Practices for Audit Committees” analyzing the effectiveness of audit committees and the division of responsibilities between the Board of Directors/Audit Committee, Executive Management, the Independent Auditors, and the Internal Auditors.

The ongoing standardization of accounting standards in 53 countries. 

- Financial statements are an inherent part of any company’s policy of transparency and are essential to the investor’s decision process.  In the current environment of accelerated economic globalization, it is with enthusiasm that we receive the news that seven (7) international consulting firms have concluded their survey of generally accepted accounting principles in 53 countries that, in combination, represent 95% of world GNP.  This work is the fruit of the 1999 International Accounting Development Forum, sponsored by the World Bank, which has fostered the application of good corporate governance practices worldwide. The World Bank intends to consolidate these accounting standards by 2005 and thus ensure their gradual implementation by companies planning to go global. There has been clear evidence that market associations and companies in many countries have voluntarily worked to consolidate some of their accounting principles into internationally accepted standards.  Brazil is an excellent example, insofar as the Bovespa New Market requires financial statements to be prepared in accordance with US GAAP or IASC GAAP.  International level standardization of accounting standards is yet another corporate governance globalization facilitator.  

It seems that the Board of Directors failed too

- Xerox, once the pride of the US and global economies, and a symbol of success in business and in technological innovation, is currently facing serious problems.  Worse, it would seem that its own Board of Directors is responsible for this fall from grace. In a recent BusinessWeek article, insinuatingly entitled “Hush! The Board of Directors is sleeping”, Louis Lavelle lays responsibility for the company’s difficulties at the door of its own Board of Directors, and lists the main reasons for this conclusion: a) unsatisfactory recent CEO succession procedures: b) a former CEO stays on in the company; c) too few board members with a background in technology, the company’s core business; d) few independent board members; e) board members too busy with their involvement in several other boards of directors; and, lastly, f) board members holding few company shares, resulting in lack of interest in company business. Louis Lavelle’s article can be found in the LCV website (www.lcvco.com.br), Technical Material Section

National Association of Corporate Directors – NACD

- The qualification program of the US-based NACD for 2001 is already available and may be accessed through its website (www.nacdonline.org). Events worth noting are the NACD Annual Conference, to be held from October 15 through 17 in Washington, and the seminar, “Guidelines for the Board Member”.  This seminar is given four times a year in the form of an intensive one-day session.  It enables those who attend, particularly new board members, to understand their role and responsibilities from a US point of view of corporate governance.

Best Corporate Governance Practices

Taken from the Brazilian Best Corporate Governance Practices Code.

Remuneration of the Board Member

Board members should be paid on a basis equivalent to the hourly rate of the company’s CEO, as applied to the time they actually dedicate to the company.



LCV NEWS - November-December/2000

LCV NEWS - September-October/2000

LCV NEWS - July-August/2000
LCV NEWS - May-June/2000
LCV NEWS - March-April/2000
LCV NEWS - January-February/2000
LCV NEWS - November-December/1999
LCV NEWS - October/1999
LCV NEWS - September/1999
LCV NEWS - August/1999
LCV NEWS - July/1999
LCV NEWS - June/1999
LCV NEWS - May/1999

Retorna - Back