LCV

Menu
LCV News

NEWS ABOUT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - July-August/2001

 IBGC – Brazilian Corporate Governance Institute

- The Porto Alegre chapter of the IBGC (Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance), under the general coordination of João Verner Juenemam, continues to actively promote monthly discussions on corporate governance.  In August, a talk was given on “Corporate Governance Score System”, a pioneer undertaking carried out by SR Rating, Brazil’s first risk classification company.  For this occasion, SR Rating sent its CEO, Paulo Rabello de Castro and its Corporate Governance Director, Luciano Carvalho Ventura to speak to a large audience of interested people. A date has also been set for the Second Brazilian Corporate Governance Congress. This will be held in São Paulo on Monday, November 12, venue to be confirmed.  As with last year’s highly successful event, the Congress will be opened with a gala dinner on November 11.  Among the speakers, the IBGC is happy to confirm the presence of two of the world’s major authorities on Corporate Governance, Robert G. Monks and Stephen Davis.  Further information available on tel. (11) 3043 7008 or on the www.ibgc.org.br site.

 

BOVESPA (São Paulo Stock Exchange) continues its task of strengthening the Brazilian capital market. 

 

As part of its ongoing program of promoting good Corporate Governance practices for all capital markets, BOVESPA has established different Corporate Governance levels: Level 1 and Level 2, and the New Market for companies to voluntarily and formally comply with certain Corporate Governance practices.  In a ceremony held on the new BOVESPA premises, for which invitations were greatly in demand, fifteen (15) companies registered for Level 1 –BOVESPA Market. These were: Bradesco, Itaú, Bradespar, Gerdau, Globo Cabo, Itausa, Perdigão, Randon Participações, Sadia, Unibanco, Unibanco Holdings, Varig Part. em Serviços Complementares, Varig Part. em Transportes Aéreos, Varig Viação Aérea RioGrandense, and WEG. The shares of all these companies became part of a new index, the IGC (Index of Shares under Special Corporate Governance Registration).  The chief compliance practices of Level l are: a) to maintain a minimum number of company shares, representing 25% of capital, circulating in the market; b) public share offers via mechanisms that promote widespread distribution of capital: c) improvement in quarterly disclosures, among which are consolidation and special review requirements; d) compliance with disclosure regulations for transactions involving shares issued by the company’s controlling shareholders or directors; e) disclosure of shareholder agreements and stock option programs; and  f) the preparation of an annual corporate events calendar. At Level 2, BOVESPA has prepared a series of requirements, including, recourse to the Arbitration Council’s decision to settle corporate controversy. BOVESPA carefully selected the members of this Council from a group of high level and experienced executives, all of whom merit the respect of the Brazilian capital market.  They are: Roberto Teixeira da Costa, Ary Oswaldo Mattos Filho, Francisco da Costa e Silva, Modesto Carvalhosa, Alfredo Lamy Filho, Paulo Aragão, and Nelson Eizirik. As a further part of its program of strengthening the Brazilian capital market, BOVESPA has also included into its organization structure, the position of Market Ombudsman with the skills and experience to handle consultants, complaints, and claims relating to negotiation, custody, and stock exchange operation settlement matters.  The BOVESPA Board of Directors selected a highly qualified person to carry out this important function, Joubert Rovai, a distinguished and experienced capital market expert.  Claims or consultations to the Market Ombudsman may be sent via telephone no. 0800 770 0149 or email,  ombudsman@bovespa.com.br, and also on the BOVESPA site’s Ombudsman  page (www.bovespa.com.br). Replies will be sent to all claims or consultations within a maximum period of forty-eight (48) hours.

 

Company directors and officers offer guarantees to minority shareholders in Brazil

 

The globalization of Brazilian companies through issues of ADR’s (American Depositary Receipts) has led to the introduction of a new type of insurance in Brazil, one that is very common in the USA and Europe, the D & O (directors and officers). This is a civil liability insurance protecting board members and/or officers against indemnity cases brought by the government, clients, employees, or shareholders, on alleged omissions or errors against directors and officers in running the respective company. Claims and cases brought by minority shareholders are extremely common.  With the current growing trend in Brazil to protect minority shareholder interests, an increased demand for this type of insurance is expected. A number of insurance companies and brokers in Brazil, such as, Unibanco AIG, AON, and Chubb already offer this type of insurance in the Brazilian market, and confirm the increased demand by board members and company officers for this type of protection.

 

Increasing interest in Corporate Governance in Brazil

 

The CRA-SP (São Paulo Regional Administration Council), whose members include the greatest number of persons with business administration background in Brazil, presided over by Roberto Carvalho Cardoso, is one of the country’s most active Administration Councils.  It recently sponsored a talk and debate on Corporate Governance at the Council’s ordinary general meeting, coordinated by Luciano Carvalho Ventura.  Despite the fact that the basic brief of Corporate Governance is based on the Agent Theory, an economics principle, Corporate Governance is highly relevant in the business administration field of knowledge, as such, of considerable interest to regional business administration councils. An article written by journalist, Alexandre Marson on this talk/debate was published in the House Organ of the Professional Directors of the State of São Paulo, Administrador Profissional, and is available in the site’s Technical Material section (www.lcvco.com.br).

 

Improved Annual Reports

 

The Annual Report is a vital part of the process of transparency in the relationship between a company and its shareholders, and with the market in general. MZ Consult recently carried out an interesting study showing that many Brazilian companies wishing to attract foreign investors, who tend to demand a greater degree of transparency than their Brazilian counterparts, are upgrading the degree of information disclosed to the market, in terms both of volume and of type of information. An analysis of the annual reports of 56 companies with ADR’s in the US showed that the average number of pages in 1998 was 8.4, which grew to 10.4 in 1999, and, in 2000, arrived at 14. The balance sheet and environment-related information were present on an increasingly large scale in the reports of companies analyzed, as follows: 27.3% in 1998, 43.6 % in 1999, and 56.4 % in 2000.  The results on disclosures in annual reports on Corporate Governance practices implemented, have clearly shown that, for some of the companies studied, where not a single company mentioned Corporate Governance in their 1998 and 1999 reports, 12.7% included the subject in their annual reports for 2000.

 

A politically incorrect CEO.    

 

In a recent Wall Street Journal article, based on several market opinions, Rhadeus Herrick, cites Exxon Mobil Corp. CEO, Lee Raymond, as being too politically incorrect for a large modern corporation. Among Herrick’s examples was Raymond’s radical stance against the Kyoto Agreement to fight the greenhouse effect, his intolerance of some minorities’ human rights, and the lawsuit brought against Exxon Mobil by the USA, alleging that the company had supported the military regime in Indonesia that had tortured and killed people living close to its operational center in the province of Aceh. Exxon Mobil’s competition is taking a different route.  The company’s European rivals, BP Plc and Royal Dutch/Shell Group gave significant support to the principles set forth in the Kyoto Agreement, and, in December, five American oil companies joined forces with human rights groups, and agreed to examine any alleged abuse of human rights in their overseas operations. Sixty-three year old Raymond has held the position of CEO of Exxon Mobil  since 1993 and is also Chairman of the Board of Directors.   The ill-advised practice of the same person holding these two positions in a company could be part of the answer as to why a professional with such a politically incorrect image, could head up a company the size of Exxon Mobil, for so long.  Without doubt, with the backing of the Board of Directors, an independent Chairman would have obliged Raymond to modify his position and perhaps, even increase the market value of Exxon Mobil shares, in benefit of the company’s shareholders.

 

National Association of Corporate Directors – NACD.

 

This year, the Annual NACD Conference will be held at the Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC from October 14 through 16, its main topic being “Adding Global Vision”. In line with the current US economic climate, the conference will organize panels to discuss action strategies of boards of directors.  This will cover not only periods when companies are undergoing difficulties, but also preventive strategies to counter future problems.  Another important topic to be discussed during this conference is evaluation of board members.

 

This topic has become very relevant due to the fact that the Board of Directors is the most important pillar of support for any Corporate Governance procedure.  Further information on the conference may be obtained from the site: (www.nacdonline.org).

 

International Corporate Governance Network 

 

The ICGN (International Corporate Governance Network) held its seventh World Conference in Tokyo, Japan from July 11 through 13 this year.  The main topic was “Global Corporate Governance: Myth and Reality”, and was sponsored by the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Japanese Corporate Governance Forum.  It was held in the Okura Hotel, Tokyo, and attended by over 440 representatives from 23 countries.  It was hardly surprising to note that the largest representation of over 300 was the Japanese, but this was also due to the fact that Japan has great interest in improving its companies’ level of Corporate Governance, as a method of attracting institutional investors, particularly Us pension funds. The second largest delegation was the 50-member US delegation.  Several countries were represented by a single delegate, among them Thailand, China, and Russia.  As in the past, Brazil was present at the conference with its delegation consisting of IBGC Executive Director, Heloisa Bedicks, Sandra Guerra, Bengt Hallqvist, Luciano Ventura, and President of the CVM (Brazilian Securities Commission), José Luis Osório.  After his talk, Osorio was greatly applauded since he began and ended his presentation in Japanese.  After the Conference ended, the ICGN Members’ Annual General Assembly was held.  Among other matters, it elected four (4) new members to its Board of Directors, of whom Brazil’s Sandra Guerra was one.  Another piece of good news for the Brazilian community involved in Corporate Governance topics is that Rio de Janeiro is a strong candidate for hosting the Annual ICGN Assembly in July 2004, after Milan in 2002 and Amsterdam in 2003.

 

Best Corporate Governance Practices

 

Taken from the Best Corporate Governance Practices – Brazil.

 

Changes in Company controls:

Change in company control

                        Since the majority of Brazilians have a single controller or a controlling group, the purchase of the control or going private, are, at present the two major problems encountered by Corporate Governance in Brazil.

-          Option of selling minority shares ( tag along)

            Transfer of control must be effected at a transparent price.

The sales of minority and/or preferred investments, should be based on the bylaws, where conditions of sale must be clearly defined.

-          Going private

            A controller or controlling group wishing to acquire 100% of capital, and go private, should advise the other shareholders of its intentions.

Whenever possible, private companies or “limitadas” should adhere to the same principles.  The controlling shareholder should not take advantage of its position as sole purchaser to lower the acquisition price.

The price should represent the company’s economic value.

Status quo protection measures(poison pills)             

The Board of Directors and the Executive Management Board should not create commitments with the specific intention of causing problems in the transfer of company control .



LCV NEWS - May-June/2001

LCV NEWS - March-April/2001

LCV NEWS - January-February/2001

LCV NEWS - November-December/2000

LCV NEWS - September-October/2000

LCV NEWS - July-August/2000
LCV NEWS - May-June/2000
LCV NEWS - March-April/2000
LCV NEWS - January-February/2000
LCV NEWS - November-December/1999
LCV NEWS - October/1999
LCV NEWS - September/1999
LCV NEWS - August/1999
LCV NEWS - July/1999
LCV NEWS - June/1999
LCV NEWS - May/1999

Retorna - Back